Will
Babylon
Be Rebuilt in Iraq?
.pdf
By David Turner
Another way to ask the title question is , should we understand the
Babylon
in Revelation 18 to be the same literal
Babylon
of the Old Testament? The answer to this question is dependent on the prophetic
context of Isaiah 13-14. If this passage has already been fulfilled, then
Revelation 18 would probably not be the same literal city spoken of in Isaiah 13
and 14, for Isaiah 13:19-20 states, “Babylon…
will be overthrown by God like Sodom and Gomorrah. She will never
be inhabited or lived in through all generations….” Many evangelical scholars
hold that this passage has already been fulfilled.[1]
There is strong evidence from the context of Isaiah 13-14 that the
passage has not been fulfilled, but awaits the details described in Revelation
18. First, the judgment described in Isaiah 13 is more consistent with the
events described in the tribulation than with anytime in known history.
Babylon
has never gone through a destruction similar to Sodom
and Gomorrah
(Isaiah 13: 19 and Jeremiah 50:46). Neither did the overthrow by the Persians or
the Medes resemble the violence described in Isaiah 13:19-20. Cyrus had the city
handed over to him. The fall of Babylon
has been described by past historians as one that occurred gradually. For
centuries after the conquest by Cyrus Babylon was still inhabited, and even
today Arabians have been know to use the building materials and pitch there
tents in the cities remains.[2]
A second reason for understanding Isaiah 13-14 as yet future is that
according to Isaiah 14:1-8 Babylon will be judged
during a period when Israel
is restored in the land. Isaiah 14:1-2 was not fulfilled at the time of Israel’s return
from Babylonian exile. Israel
did not possess the nations, nor did she make “captives of captors”. At the
hands of the Persians and Medes following the takeover of Babylon the lands were not at “rest and peace”
as described in Isaiah 14:7. Neither was the universal nature of Isaiah 14:9
fulfilled. Each of these prophecies are best understood in the context of the
final judgment described prior to the millennium in Revelation.
The above alone does not prove that Babylon
will be rebuilt in Iraq.
It does however negate the accusation that it can not be rebuilt on the bases of
Isaiah 13:20. With the present occupation of the U.S, along with the constant
instability of the Middle East, it may seem unreasonable to assume that
Babylon
will be rebuilt. But then again, who believed at the turn of the twentieth
century that Israel
would be established as a nation 50 years later. It is conceivable that Babylon will be rebuilt in Iraq. According to Garner, in
“Curses and Prophesies”[3]
(which was written before the presence of the U.S.)
Iraq
was in the process of “restoring or
rebuilding some of the structures … in the ancient city.”
In conclusion, if the prophecies of Isaiah 13-14 have already been
fulfilled, then
Babylon on
Revelation 18 should be understood as allegorical. But, the evidence indicates
that Isaiah 13-14 has not been fulfilled. If we hold to a literal fulfillment of
prophecy, and this author does, then it is best to understand that a literal
city of Babylon
will be built, and then be destroyed according the Isaiah’s prophecy.
[1] Scofield Reference Bible, 1917
edition. Pp. 1346-47.
[2] Bibliotheca Sacra, 133:529:19-27.
January-March, 1976).